The Last New England Vampire

Latest

Thanks to the 5th graders at Tomie Barfield Elementary…

…for one of the best questions I’ve been asked in an author visit: “If you had to describe being an author in one word, what word would you pick?”

(Phew, these 5th graders don’t believe in easy questions.)

The word that popped into my head was “liberating.”

Being an author means that all the thoughts and dreams and characters and ideas that congregate in my head are free to come out, be shared, find connections and communion with readers. It means that I’m free to imagine, create, dream, wonder, and share. It means that I’m free to sit around in jeans and t-shirt with bare feet to do my work. All of that is wonderfully liberating, and I’m grateful for it–and for the question that made me realize it more fully!

Wild Things

I was sitting on the couch last night in tears after learning that Maurice Sendak, at 83, had finally left us. My sister-in-law was giving me sympathetic but slightly funny looks, and I explained that it felt like one of the pillars of children’s lit had crumbled. He changed the way we all felt about something as basic and vital as words and pictures and stories. You have to think of someone bigger than life, I said, someone iconic–like, say, Hemmingway. But imagine a Hemmingway whose personal life was not an alcoholic, cat-infested disaster; Mr. Sendak was by all accounts something of a curmudgeon, but a perfectly functional curmudgeon. And then you have to imagine a Hemmingway who stayed creatively productive and disciplined enough to produce strong, original work into his eighth decade. That’s who we have lost.

So it seems appropriate on a blog about monsters to say farewell to the man who let the monsters of children’s books out. And who also let them in to our deepest selves.

That’s the thing about Where the Wild Things Are. It shook up the world of children’s lit by its stark honesty about children’s emotions. Many people have pointed out, over the years, how it was one of the first books to acknowledge that children get angry–furiously angry, angry enough to shout “I’ll eat you up!” and mean it–at their parents. Last night it occurred to me that the book also acknowledges the rage that a parent feels toward a child who has gotten on her (it’s Max’s mother in the book) last nerve. “Go to your room!” really means “Get out of my sight before I lose it!”

And it’s true. It’s shocking how quickly impatience and frustration can tip over into anger, over something as small as bucking a child into a car seat or getting a sock on a foot. And no one has ever been mad enough to scream at me at the top of her lungs–except my girl. Because I said she needed to eat her jelly beans upstairs and not downstairs.

But it was not only anger that this book opened up–it was also escape. The intense desire that every child has to get away from even a loving, caring, nurturing family. Max wants to leave so badly that the walls of his room dissolve and he sails away “through night and day, and in and out of weeks, and almost over a year” (in one of the loveliest lines ever written) to live with (and eventually control) the monsters of his rage.

(It’s the same desire that, on a much lower level of poetry, J.K. Rowling tapped into with Harry Potter. Many people have commented that Harry Potter is, at heart, a  boarding school story, just like those written by Enid Blyton for another generation. Few people have noted that one of the reasons the boarding school story, in all its formulaic glory, is such a hit with kids is that it provides an escape. As intensely as kids want to be loved and cuddled and kept safe, they also want to flee. It’s not a comfortable truth for the adults who write and illustrate and edit and publish and buy the children’s books, but it’s still true. The boarding school motif just provides a convenient cover.)

Sometimes we would rather be with the monsters than when the parents who love us so dearly. That’s such an honest and frightening truth that it puts any vampire story to shame.

But then we come home and we find supper waiting for us and it is still hot. That’s true too.

Thank you, Mr. Sendak. And rest well.

MERCY Tattoos for Supernatural Readers


Visit the site of my fabulously cool publicist, Kirsten Cappy of Curious City, to find out more about a promotion going on this week. Free tattoos of Mercy’s burning heart!

Kirsten says: “The author of MERCY: THE LAST NEW ENGLAND VAMPIRE (VOYA’s Top Shelf Fiction for Middle School Readers) is giving away temporary tattoos of Mercy’s burning heart on my site this week.  Tattoo wearers will then have a chance to win free signed copies of the book.”

“Why the burning heart?”

“It is a bit grim as it is a TRUE story of a vampire eradication in 1890′s New England. No vampire romance here…”

For the details: http://curiouscitydpw.com/2012/04/11/mercy-tattooed-on-my-heart/

Maranacook High School

They also had matching chef's hat for my daughter and me!

A shout-out to Bunkie Wilson, librarian extraordinaire, and the book club of the Maranacook High School, who gave me one of the best author visits I’ve had. Enthusiastic prep, intelligent questions, and one of the loveliest gifts a visiting author ever got–a recipe box (they discovered from my online bio that I like to cook) covered with favorite quotes from my novels. (Mercy, of course, plus The Manny, The Secret of the Roseand The Dragon’s Son.) It was so touching to discover, in such detail, exactly what had captured the attention of my readers. Some were my favorites too–some I had completely forgotten writing! But all were great to read. It will have an honored place in my kitchen.

Hooray for Hylary the Library Lady, who gave Mercy a glowing review. May Mercy have many fans in California, far from her New England roots! (Useful discussion questions here for teachers and librarians–good stuff if you’re planning to use Mercy in the classroom or for a book club.)

 

Best School Visit Question

Today I was asked the best question ever during a school visit.

I was at a middle school for my first full-day visit about MERCY. Went well. I could sharpen up my presentation a bit, I think–trying to make too many points in too little time. But the kids were definitely attentive while I was reading–a good sign.

In the Q&A session, I naturally got the question, “Team Edward or Team Jacob?”

“Ooh–erck–neither!” I said, very articulately.

Then a quiet, coltish girl who’s going to be a beauty when she grows into those legs said, “Team guy who hit Bella with a car?”

YES! That’s my girl.

So I did it. I read TWILIGHT.

For a long time I didn’t read it just because people I respected did not care for it much. Then I didn’t read it because I was writing my own vampire novel and didn’t want Stephanie Meyer’s vision creeping into my head. Then I just got kind of stubborn.

But I finally had to read it for another project I am working on, and this is what I have to say.

IT IS NOT ROMANTIC WHEN:

…you say you want to drive yourself home and a guy grabs you by the arm and drags you to his car.

…a guy follows you on a trip to another city because it’s not safe for you to be out alone.

…a guy sneaks into your bedroom without your permission or knowledge.

…a guy showers you with compliments, praise, and rapt attention, and then insists that you are not capable of taking care of yourself, so he will have to look after you very, very closely.

…a guy refuses to let you make any decisions, so that in order to save your mother’s life you have to sneak away from him.

…you say to a guy, “I love you so much it’s all right for you to kill me.”

IT’S JUST NOT. Okay? Are we clear?

Mercy on the Web

Well, my goodness–a virtual museum all about Mercy Brown. I particularly like Mercy’s profile. She’s into quilting and canning and haunting her cemetery.

Ghosts? Vampires? Oh My.

People do continue to be fascinated by Mercy Brown’s story…and her grave. People like the folks over at RIParanormal, who did an investigation into allegations that the Chestnut Hill Cemetery is haunted by some kind of evil presence. I have to say, I wonder why. Mercy’s story is a sad one, to be sure, and how could I blame anyone who finds it compelling? I found it so myself. But why should Mercy be haunting her gravesite? If you think she was a vampire–well, her heart was removed and burned, which in any kind of vampire folklore should be enough to put her spirit to rest. And if you think she wasn’t–surely a young woman would forgive her family and community for actions which were taken against her only after her death, and which were a desperate and doomed attempt to save the life of her only brother.

Perhaps I’m taking it all too seriously…but after spending a lot of time with Mercy’s story, I find myself feeling a bit protective of her. Her death was sad and so was what happened to her body. No need to go on picking on her long after the fact.

I’m on the side of my protagonist’s best friend, who says that the dead “don’t hang around figuring out ways to hurt the people who hurt them. I know they don’t….Only the living do that.”

And of course, in my book, the best friend was right….

Too Good To Be True!

Umm…edit out that exclamation mark. It WAS too good to be true.

This is not going to be a post about vampires…not exactly. Just about being a writer today–and a television viewer–and the things that are lurking out there.

Last week I got the kind of e-mail every author dreams about. A producer for a cable TV show had heard of Mercy and thought I might be a good fit for the show. Could he give me a call?

First I thought somebody was joking. The guy’s name (I am not making this up) was Gregory Fake. But I checked out the show–it seemed real. The Balancing Act, on Lifetime. Oh, boy. I’m imagining flying down to Florida for my interview, getting professionally made up, looking suave and sophisticated on air as I chat about Mercy, New England folklore, young adult literature today.  I did have a few minutes of wondering why a show that looked quite chatty and chirpy wanted to interview the author of a dark YA fantasy, but hey–they know their audience best, right? Maybe they wanted to hear about how the vampire romance has run its course. Maybe they were interested in the historical background. I was giddy.

Luckily, I have a canny editor at Islandport Press who checked it out before I committed to anything. Thanks to bloggers Larry Brooks at Storyfix and Kit Brittingham at Writer Beware, I knew before I got back in touch that The Balancing Act does indeed do interview with authors. For which they charge a fee. A hefty fee. $5900, to be exact.

Now, there’s no law that says you can’t charge people to be on your TV program, although it would be classier, Mr. Fake, to mention that upfront. (I’m really not making that name up.) I mean, there’s no  law that says I can’t charge you to walk into my house if I feel like it. But there is an unwritten law that you DON’T charge for publicity. Publicity–by which I mean reviews, interviews, blurbs, endorsements, and recommendations–is supposed to be unbiased. If a journalist is interviewing me about Mercy, readers or viewers should be able to trust that said journalist has chosen to talk to me because he or she thinks the audience will be interested–not because my money is in her or his pocket.

When the author pays to promote the book, that is called advertising. And there is not a thing wrong with advertising, except that it should be labeled as such.

I don’t have cable, so I have never seen The Balancing Act. Perhaps they let all of their viewers  know upfront that the guests on the show have paid to be there. But I have to say, I doubt it. And if they don’t, that’s out of bounds. When you’re watching an ad, you should know it. When you’re watching journalism, you should know that too.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.